Knee-Mail: Doctor X

Knee-Mail: Doctor X
From: Kent Hovind
Sent: January 10, 2010
Posted: December 10, 2010
To: Sam
Subject: Dr. Hovind’s Degree

Sam: Hey, Brother Hovind, I read one of the anti-Hovind Web Sites the other day. They said you don’t have a real PhD. What’s this all about?

KH: Why would my degree matter to the truths of the argument? The high priest, Annas, and lots of top religious dignitaries saw the boldness of Peter and John and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men (Acts 4:13), yet those same men changed the world by preaching the truth. If they don’t think my degree is legitimate, then tell them to call me Kent, Mr. Hovind, Bubba, or “Hey, you ignorant man!” and then let’s get back to the real issues.

Sam: Good point. You could be a kindergarten drop-out and still know how to preach the truth.

KH: Exactly! Down through history there have been thousands, if not millions of great military, religious, political, and scientific leaders that had very little formal education. Abe Lincoln only finished a few grades of school and made one of the best presidents ever. God can use anyone to do His work. Don’t let Satan tell you that you aren’t qualified because you don’t have a degree. He may want you to get one or He may not. Just do what He says to do (John 2:50). Those critics who raise the degree question are often trying to draw attention away from their own religion of evolution looking stupid.

Sam: I admit you do make their theory look silly.

KH: It is one of the silliest theories ever invented! Do you know the story of Nehemiah?

Sam: Yes. God called him to go back a rebuild the wall around Jerusalem.

KH: Do you know what his job was before that?

Sam: He was the king’s cup-bearer (Nehemiah 1:11).

KH: Right. He was a butler! Is a butler qualified to be in charge of a massive building project like putting a wall completely around a major city?

Sam: I guess God thought he was.

KH: It seems so. He did the job in record time with incredible opposition (Nehemiah 6:15). Even if I had no degree or schooling at all, I’ve still got enough common sense to know there is a God who created this amazing universe! Anyone with one eye and half a brain can see that!

Let me ask you this, are there any people with degrees from “accredited” schools that believe and teach biblical creation?

Sam: Sure! Thousands of them. Just look at www.icr.org for example. That’s just one organization of scientists.

KH: Do you think there are more scientists that fear revealing that they are “young earth creationists” because they know they may lose their job, position, or research grants?

Sam: I would bet there are many thousands of those as well.

KH: So, the fact that a scientist has a degree and believes in creation doesn’t convince the skeptics to believe in creation does it?

Sam: No. It doesn’t seem to phase the skeptics.

KH: So why would my degree being accepted by them make any difference?

Sam: I guess it wouldn’t.

KH: If I dropped everything and went to an “accredited” school and got a degree critics would recognize as “legitimate” and came out still believing the Bible and creation, would that help them become believers?

Sam: Probably not. I don’t think they want to believe.

KH: I don’t either. Have the majority of scientists ever been wrong in the past?

Sam: Oh, my! Thousands of times! Flat earth, geocentric theory, doctrine of humors, big rocks fall faster, man can’t go over 40 mph without his heart stopping… it would take a long time just to list all the ideas that were believed by the majority and later proven wrong.

KH: Exactly! So, their argument from “majority opinion” or “all scientists believe…” are meaningless. When they resort to criticizing my degree or my admittedly bad spelling, it’s a sign they can’t deal with the real subject at hand—the lack of real evidence for evolution. They try to ridicule creationists for all sorts of things. The degree question is just one.

Sanballat mocked Nehemiah as he built the wall (Nehemiah 4:1) and Tobiah ridiculed the wall by saying, “Even that which they build, if a fox go up, he shall even break down their stone wall” (Nehemiah 4:3). It’s normal for critics to make fun of anyone who tries to build something for God. Nehemiah turned them over to God (v. 4) and kept building. His enemies tried every trick in the book to stop him—threats, ridicule, discouragement, political pressure, even force, but God protected him and he kept building. That’s what I normally do. Let them criticize and I’ll keep building. The finished wall spoke for itself, as do my results.

Sam: Good advice.

KH: One more thing…

Sam: What’s that?

KH: I worked hard for my degree. I don’t know if they worked hard or cheated to get theirs, but all of my studies from my “non-accredited” (by them) university left me believing that a really intelligent Designer created an incredible universe for a reason. All of their studies from an “accredited” school left them believing that nobody made the universe for any purpose and their great-great-great… grandpa was a rock! Who’s the fool? (Psalm 14:1; 53:1)

Sam: Good point! Thank-you, DOCTOR Hovind.

KH: You are welcome.

Related resources from CSE – Gap Theory booklet, Creation Seminar, Part 2
*Genesis 1:5; Exodus 20:11; Exodus 31:17; Matthew 19:4; Romans 5:12; I Corinthians 15:21

25 Comments

  1. Burke Thornburg December 10, 2010 5:21 pm Reply

    It was likely 10 years ago in I met you during a break at the Holiday Inn in Portland,Or., My son as well, and he gave you a plastic rubber-band shooter that could rapid fire. He is now 20yrs old and in school for being a fire-fighter. He is very strong in his desire to evanegalize and credits the foundation in part laid by your ministry and boldness. We have a inquiery for you which I use at the community college where I work, and it brings angst from the sciences professors when I bring it up. So I wanted to run it by you as to how accurate I may be.

    I say that the table of geologic time originated in the mid-1800′s and as the ages were assigned to it by committee, then it would be a nice little class project to have students re-assign “the ages” to the columns, then show how they can be validated (as such) by the radiometric methods available today….. that since there are so-many-selections to go from all that matters is are ages assigned by committee, and there is no actual dating of rocks without the assumptions. It is essentially of no-value unless you simply want it to have value.

    Stay fit, we love ya. Burke and Mitch

    http://none...

  2. Ken Tyner December 10, 2010 5:34 pm Reply

    Well argued Kent. It’s funny how those people with accredited degrees can’t comprehend the simplicity of an honest argument.

    http://www.kentynerministries.org

  3. Kym Carter December 10, 2010 7:20 pm Reply

    Blessed blessed blessed!!! Thank you for sharing!

    http://freedom2flythruchrist.blogspot.com/

  4. Geno December 10, 2010 8:44 pm Reply

    Kent Hovind wrote:
    If they don’t think my degree is legitimate, then tell them to call me Kent, Mr. Hovind, Bubba, or “Hey, you ignorant man!” and then let’s get back to the real issues.
    *********
    Geno answers:
    Thank you. I’ll stick with “Kent” or “Mr. Hovind” then. I feel to do otherwise would diminish the degrees of those YEC with PhD’s from universities with full academic accreditation such as: Dr. John Baumgardner, Dr. Walt Brown, Dr. Danny Faulkner, Dr. Russell Humphreys, Dr. John Woodmorappe, Dr. Larry Vardiman, etc.
    *********

    Kent comments:
    I worked hard for my degree. I don’t know if they worked hard or cheated to get theirs, but all of my studies from my “non-accredited” (by them) university …..
    *******
    Geno points out:
    As a teacher, you should know that an academic degree from an institution with no academic accreditation has no (academic) value.

    Since the purpose of a doctoral thesis is to add to the body of human knowledge, I don’t understand why you have been so reluctant for many yours to openly share your. I have read the thesis asserted to be yours that was leaked on-line. From an academic standpoint, I would consider it an embarrassment that does not rise to the level of rigor expected of an undergraduate degree, let alone recognition of the highest level of academic achievement.

  5. Lisa December 10, 2010 9:03 pm Reply

    I just wanted to say that I really appreciate what you said. I find it appealing that you don’t get offended by their accusations and criticism, but merely address the real issue, that is, their soul and their decision about what they will believe in. Your argument is very well done and an encouragement to me. Thank you.

    I felt that the Lord sent me to catch up on how you are doing and I am so glad I did.

    Years ago, when I made the choice to believe in God, and when I was born again, I simply knew, though I had been taught evolution all my life, that it was the Bible that was true. I no longer needed so-called scientific proof. I just knew. Since that time, I have found so much more proof around me to support what the Bible teaches and like another commentor stated, the arguments for evolution seem so ridiculous I can’t believe anyone can believe in it, except that they just don’t really stop and think about it. They accept it because they were taught it from a very young age.

    Well…anyway, thanks. You are appreciated.

  6. Corey Schlueter December 10, 2010 9:22 pm Reply

    I believe that this is a response for me when I asked back about Kent’s dissertation. I am quite unimpressed as he does not answer whether it should be qualified for a post-secondary paper.

    “A fool and his money are soon parted”

  7. Ken Tyner December 10, 2010 9:37 pm Reply

    Geno, the quality of an education is not determined by accreditation of the University, but rather by the understanding of the subject matter. Any rote learner can achieve a degree by an accredited University, while still lacking understanding of the subject matter. Accreditation is not a universal concept, and doesn’t add to the quality of education of any individual.

    http://www.kentynerministries.org

  8. Caleb December 11, 2010 4:49 am Reply

    Me”Mr. Henry Ford what college did you graduate from?

    Ford”I did not even finish high school, I dropped out of school when I was fifteen

    Me” you must be a fool.

    Ford” what about my motor company

    Me” all that matters is a degree

    Seriously I hope this shows how foolish this argument is. Until you have real world experience that degree dont mean squat and as far as I can tell Mr. Hovind has had a lot of real world experience with people and helping them.

    personally I have a bachlers degree in pastoral theology but it dont mean squat if I cant help people.

    What real world experience do you have?

  9. Legna December 11, 2010 11:14 am Reply

    Hi,

    1. I woulod like to know how can we know how Jesus Christ looked like? DO we have evidence about how He looked like?

    2. Mr. Hovind, did you see Walter Veith’s seminars about evolution, the boook of revelation and nutrition?

    On my blog i have posted Walter Veith’s work as ”Grade 5: The Hidden History Of The Human Race – FActs Vs. Fictions” …. every seminar is about 90 minutes…

    If you have posibbility to watch them (every day one seminar) please do so.. I would like to know your opinion on his work(seminars).. please watch them in their order(from nr1 , 2, 3 etc) because its important…

    75% of his work is about the explanation of the book of Daniel and book of revelation

    thank you and God bless you

    P.S. i have also your work embeded on my blog and i spread the word about it and also a bunch of other documentaries about different topics… everything 100% documented

    http://www.stdwytk.blogspot.com

  10. Vicki December 13, 2010 5:31 pm Reply

    Just reading in Galations with my son and daughter this morning. In the first chapter, the apostle Paul explains that he was called by God, not by man. After being called by God to preach to the heathen, he was not required by God to confer with other men (even the disciples). He was simply obedient to what God told him to do.

    College degrees will probably always be important to man. But the degrees should only be a vehicle to serve man – not for man to serve the degrees. I have seen too many people who were willing to overlook fact because it didn’t agree with the way they were taught. (Remember the surgeons who would be working on actual patients/bodies and thinking that the old anatomy books (filled with many errors)had to be correct even though the evidence of truth was right under their nose).

    Thank you Kent for continuing to study and learn about creation and letting people know your findings. My family and I are glad to have access to your videos and were delighted to meet you in person. We are thankful that we are free to have access to information that logically looks at facts in the natural world and doesn’t presume to tell others that there couldn’t be a God who is creator of all.

  11. Geno December 14, 2010 6:26 pm Reply

    Ken Tryner says:
    Geno, the quality of an education is not determined by accreditation of the University, but rather by the understanding of the subject matter.
    *******
    Geno answers:
    Understood. Accreditation of a university simply certifies it meets certain MINIMUM standards of academic rigor. Can non-accredited schools meet such standards? Of course. But there are a lot of “diploma mills” out there. It is only prudent that schools require some kind of validation a source meets minimum criteria before accepting credits from other institutions. One of my mother’s students spent 4 years at an un-accredited Bible college then tried to transfer to a public school…. less than one year of her credits transferred. It is for that reason any time one of my students chooses a privately operated school, I point out they need to ensure the school they have chosen has full academic accreditation.

    Mr. Hovind’s area of specialty is “Christian Education.” I have already pointed out that in EDUCATION a doctorate from a school with no academic accreditation has no value.
    ******

    Ken points out:
    Any rote learner can achieve a degree by an accredited University, while still lacking understanding of the subject matter.
    *******
    Geno answers:
    We’re not talking about just any degree here. We’re talking about a PhD… the ultimate academic achievement. You don’t get a PhD by being a “rote learner.” That’s the entire purpose of a dissertation. A PhD dissertation is supposed to be new and original research that contributes to mankind’s body of knowledge.

    Have you read Mr. Hovind’s dissertation? I have and you should. Honestly, I would have hesitated to turn in such work as an undergraduate and would NEVER have submitted it when I was working on my masters. Small wonder Mr. Hovind has gone to such efforts for nearly 20 years to keep it from becoming public knowledge…. even though that is the primary purpose of a PhD dissertation.
    ********

    Ken poinst out:
    Accreditation is not a universal concept, and doesn’t add to the quality of education of any individual.
    ************
    Geno answers:
    Accreditation doesn’t add to the quality of education. It is nothing more than a certification the accredited institution meets certain MINIMUM criteria. Maybe you should check out the school that granted Mr. Hovind his “PhD” and see if you think they meet a minimum standard of academic rigor. When you get done checking out the school, you should read the dissertation….

    Then get back with me…..

  12. Caleb December 15, 2010 2:51 am Reply

    Geno answers:
    Accreditation doesn’t add to the quality of education. It is nothing more than a certification the accredited institution meets certain MINIMUM criteria. Maybe you should check out the school that granted Mr. Hovind his “PhD” and see if you think they meet a minimum standard of academic rigor. When you get done checking out the school, you should read the dissertation….

    Then get back with me…..

    oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    according to patriot university that was (according to them) obviously a rough draft. Considering the videos I have seen on youtube of kent hovind where everything he says is followed by blanking the screen and putting “lie” there, I would assume they are right it is a rough draft and many many people jumped on the bandwagon to make him look bad.

    also if accreditation is so that the curiclum meets a cetain minimum standard why is it that 42 percent of collage seniors could not name the dates of the civil war within a half century?

    Seriously it would be pathetically easy to point out how low the minimum standard is in accredited universities.

  13. Corey Schlueter December 15, 2010 2:43 pm Reply

    Caleb said:
    according to patriot university that was (according to them) obviously a rough draft. Considering the videos I have seen on youtube of kent hovind where everything he says is followed by blanking the screen and putting “lie” there, I would assume they are right it is a rough draft and many many people jumped on the bandwagon to make him look bad.

    ——————————

    So far, Kent has neither confirmed that this is a rough draft nor has offered to provide a “final” paper, if one exists.

    In an e-mail to Skip Evans, who had acquired the copy form Patroti, Kent states:
    “My dissertation was originally about 100 pages. I continued adding material and it grew to 250 pages. Over the last 10 years I have constantly been adding material. It is now many hundreds of pages and will be put into book form as time permits.”

    Personally, I do not care if the university is accreditated, but Kent’s thesis suggests that Patroit has substandard criteria when it comes writing a thesis.

  14. Geno December 15, 2010 5:12 pm Reply

    Caleb said:
    according to patriot university that was (according to them) obviously a rough draft.
    ********
    Geno answers:
    If it is, in fact, only a rough draft I would be delighted to read the actual dissertation. It has been nearly 20 years now and it doesn’t seem to be available. Since Mr. Hovind is so unwilling to share his dissertation with the rest of the world, the “leaked” document is the only evidence we have. I know if this had happened to me one of the first things I would do is release the actual document. One can only wonder why Mr. Hovind is so reluctant to do so.
    ********

    Caleb said:
    Considering the videos I have seen on youtube of kent hovind where everything he says is followed by blanking the screen and putting “lie” there, I would assume they are right it is a rough draft and many many people jumped on the bandwagon to make him look bad.
    *********
    Geno answers:
    I haven’t seen the youtube videos. My opinion is based entirely on reading the actual document. If Mr. Hovind doesn’t want to “look bad” all he needs do is release the final dissertation. Why won’t he do that?
    **********

    Caleb claims:
    also if accreditation is so that the curiclum meets a cetain minimum standard why is it that 42 percent of collage seniors could not name the dates of the civil war within a half century?
    ***********
    Geno points out:
    Nice misuse of statistics. Taken alone, that particular claim is meaningless. College seniors are around 22 years old. What is the percentage for that same question asked of 22 year olds who have no college? What is the percentage of those who attend Bible schools that don’t have a history requirement? Show the performance is better among students who attend non-accredited schools and you might have a case.
    ******

    Caleb claims:
    Seriously it would be pathetically easy to point out how low the minimum standard is in accredited universities.
    ***********
    Geno asks:
    Non-accredited universities aren’t even required to meet that low standard. Go ahead…. show the evidence they have higher academic standards than the accredited schools.
    ***********

    Corey says:
    (Quoting an email alleged to be from Kent Hovind)
    “My dissertation was originally about 100 pages. …. it grew to 250 pages.”

    Geno points out:
    A PhD dissertation is a final document, not a work in progress. The work upon which Mr. Hovind was granted his “degree” was the 100 pages originally submitted and it is that effort on which the quality of his academic performance should be judged.

    Further, a PhD dissertation is normally defended before a committee of (usually 3-7) PhDs. So far as we can tell, Hovind’s was reviewed by a committee of one.
    ***********

    Corey says:
    Personally, I do not care if the university is accreditated, but Kent’s thesis suggests that Patroit has substandard criteria when it comes writing a thesis.
    **********
    Geno comments:
    I do not fault Kent for his degree from a non-traditional school as my own Bachelors comes from such a program. The difference being that mine was from satellite facilities of an institution with full academic accreditation.

    The evidence is that the academic standards of Patriot University are sub-standard. Without full disclosure by Mr. Hovind, there is no reason to treat his “doctorate” as legitimate.

  15. Caleb December 16, 2010 2:05 am Reply

    Geno asks:
    Non-accredited universities aren’t even required to meet that low standard. Go ahead…. show the evidence they have higher academic standards than the accredited schools.

    *****************

    Non accredited schools tend not to offer a liberal education (not political, but broad as including many subjects), such as schools of cosmetology, or welding, or cooking. My unaccredited Bible collage only offers a degree in pastoral theology, but all the subjects are on preaching or church leadership. So in a sense they do not have higher “academic” standards, because they are focused on one subject. That being said those that I know that go to an accredited schools like that tend to get jobs quick and do not have mountains of debt attached to it.

    So I guess the comparison here is what are you buying. Your accredited college is selling you a list of goods like an education including history but many people are not getting it or the high paying jobs they were promised four years ago when they graduated high school. where as the unaccredited schools are selling you an education that turn into money, and they are receiving it, at a much lower price, in much less time.

  16. Geno December 16, 2010 6:53 pm Reply

    Caleb Says:
    My unaccredited Bible collage only offers a degree in pastoral theology, but all the subjects are on preaching or church leadership. So in a sense they do not have higher “academic” standards, because they are focused on one subject.
    *********
    Geno responds:
    That’s all fine, but by academic standards, I mean things like research citations, spelling, grammar (for example “there” instead of “their”). Even at those Bible colleges, there should be minimum standards for the basics. I’ve seen PhD theses with Bibliographies that run 4 or 5 pages. Hovind’s is practically non-existant. Just because it is focused on one subject doesn’t mean a PhD dissertation should look like it came from a high school student. BTW, aren’t all dissertations focused on one subject?
    ************

    Caleb said:
    So I guess the comparison here is what are you buying.
    ********
    Geno answers:
    In a dissertation, the candidate is selling, not buying. He’s selling the review committee on his academic excellence and new research.

    I’ll say it again…. my position is always open to review and change based on new information. To date, the only example of Hovind’s work is the “dissertation” that was leaked on-line. Based on that, my conclusion is that his work does not rise to the standard of excellence expected of one seeking the highest possible academic recognition. If this was a draft copy, I will be delighted to read the actual dissertation and, if appropriate, revise my opinion accordingly.

  17. Jason December 18, 2010 5:10 am Reply

    Hi Kent,

    It really is quite astounding how easily “Educated” people can MISS THE POINT of what you are saying. Correct me please if I am wrong but when you say things like…

    …If they don’t think my degree is legitimate, then tell them to call me Kent, Mr. Hovind, Bubba, or “Hey, you ignorant man!” and then let’s get back to the real issues….

    I take this to mean that you don’t actually care if people choose to accept whether you are qualified or not. By this statement alone you do seem quite prepared to accept the title “Ignorant man”.

    Well I think that is excellent, brilliant in fact.
    You can come to the debating table accepting the title of “The Ignorant Man” and debate with the “Highly Educated Totally Accredited Academics” and debate the REAL ISSUES.

    I think it’s fair to say that if a “Highly Educated Totally Accredited Academic” cannot sell their position successfully when pitching against an “Ignorant man” then there could be something suspect going on: Is it the academic person or the wisdom that they are trying to sell. Who can say?

    But looking again, studying further;
    If a long succession of “Highly Educated Totally Accredited Academics” cannot sell their collective position successfully when pitching against this same, one, single, “Ignorant man” then there is definitely something suspect going on: It cannot be the academics as surely at least one of them must have done enough research to shut the “Ignorant Man” up.

    It seems to me that the case is that they are unsuccessful because they are trying to sell a theory that doesn’t actually stand up to any rigor.
    Their theory IS knocked down in debate by the “Ignorant man” with no accreditation behind him.
    This must be really embarrassing, but more than that does it not call into question the theory that they are trying to sell?

    Kent, you stay put as “The Ignorant Man” it gives your work a more poignant message.

    Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men, and, God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
    1 Corinthians 1:25 & 27

    A very poignant post,

    Lots of Love

    Jason x

  18. Ramon December 20, 2010 8:50 am Reply

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s doctoral thesis contained many plagiarized paragraphs, yet every one of the thousands of liberals I’ve heard and seen who mentions him by name includes “Doctor” in his title. Many if not most (or all) of these same people would no doubt oppose Dr. Hovind’s Biblical literalism in an ad hominem attack on his academic credentials by citing Patriot University’s lack of accreditation.

    Now obviously Dr. Hovind isn’t a Civil Rights icon who’s universally idolized, and Dr. King would undoubtedly be granted many honorary doctorates if Boston University ever revoked his (and you know it won’t), so what I don’t understand is why an accredited Christian university that’s not hostile to Young Earth Creationism (like, say, Liberty University) hasn’t granted Dr. Hovind an honorary degree. Granted, what has been leaked online (I read portions of his PhD dissertation by a former debate opponent of his, Dr. Karen Bartelt) of his thesis revealed particularly poor grammar, consistent even to this day with Dr. Hovind’s blog posts, and on that basis alone it should have been rejected and sent back for proofreading, but I’ll accept that some people are better at communicating orally than through writing, and in light of Dr. Hovind’s para-academic work do I think he should he be considered for an honorary university degree, though whether he’s granted one will obviously not affect his choice to carry on presenting his message on Christian apologetics (with an emphasis on Biblical creation) in his own unique fashion.

  19. Vadik December 24, 2010 7:08 am Reply

    DEAR DR.HOVIND, MERRY CHRISTMAS! WE PRAY FOR YOU AND ALL
    THE CHRISTIANS FROM RUSSIA! KEEP ON GOING! WE WILL STAND WITH OUR
    GREAT ALMIGHTY GOD TOGETHER! GOD BLESS YOU!!

  20. GUS January 16, 2011 3:03 am Reply

    Hang in there Dr.Hovind and GOD bless.

  21. cathy January 16, 2011 5:31 am Reply

    Can Dr Hovind have visitors in prison other than family?

  22. Kelly February 16, 2011 12:27 pm Reply

    I think it’s pretty funny that evolutionists try to discredit Kent’s education. It actually makes them look that much worse when he makes more sense than they do in debates. If he is really so foolish and uneducated then how is it that he does circles around them. The wise seem to be made fools.

  23. Geno February 21, 2011 2:04 am Reply

    Kelly said:
    If he is really so foolish and uneducated then how is it that he does circles around them.

    #####
    Geno answers:
    Because popular debates before an audience are often won on polish, presentation, and sound bite, rather than substance. Mr. Hovind has a highly polished presentation that, by his own account, he has delivered hundreds of times. Professional scientists seldom take part in timed verbal debates as science is generally conducted in written exchanges without time limits.

    Why do you think Hovind refuses to take part in written debates? He claims it’s because he doesn’t type…. but we seem to see a lot of his work here and it isn’t like he didn’t have others who do type working for him.

  24. Dave Weide February 24, 2011 6:05 pm Reply

    Dr. Hovind,
    I’m deployed to Afghanistan and came across your video series here… what a blessing your work is. I’m leading a bible study here with a number of soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines and your work has us working very hard researching and learning. The evidence for a young Earth and the truth of His word is so overwhelming, it’s wonderful God placed your work in our hands here. We’re praying for you there–please know that you are making a difference in the lives of the troops half a world away.
    Dave – USAF
    Kabul, Afghanistan

  25. crystal July 29, 2011 10:09 pm Reply

    REALLY….. Who cares if he is a Dr he wants to help people. He wants to save then and this is all you can sa Honestly I my self have seen three of your tapes Dr.Hovind and I live listing to them with my children. I don’t care if you are a Dr. Are not. GODs words come from GOD and. I don’t think he cares who you are or what you have done. We are all sinners but you are trying to spread GODs word free to save others and GOD said judge not as I read. Some statements on the internet its amazing how many people will judge the people who care and want you to go to heaven. Amazing job Dr Hovind I appreciate your works and I belive GOD will also.

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.